<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rightly Dividing the Word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.one21.us/blog/rightly-dividing-the-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.one21.us/blog/rightly-dividing-the-word/</link>
	<description>1st Century Mission l 21st Century Methods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:01:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Richey</title>
		<link>http://www.one21.us/blog/rightly-dividing-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Richey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.one21.us/blog/rightly-dividing-the-word/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Great points Bill!  I have two fears along these lines.  First, that we simply assume a knowledge of the 1st Century text and jump quickly to the application of this assumed understanding.  I think we must ask the question, &#039;How can we ensure that those leading within our ministries actually know the text?&#039;  

Most seminary programs require entry level courses into important areas only to focus more heavily upon areas of ministry specialty and practical concern.  Seminaries are under pressure as they work to attract prospective students to reduce the intimidating requirements of extensive language study, back-grounds, etc.  At the end of the day, everything done w/i ministry is necessarily linked to the text of Scripture.  We need to encourage the hard, tedious, and never-ending work of Biblical studies.

Second, I&#039;m afraid that most assume that context means simply the 2 verses before and after the verse being considered.  Obviously, this concern would be mute if we addressed that which is outlined above.

It goes w/o saying, however, that these fears are equally concerning whether we are discussing older leaders or younger leaders.  In all reality, it seems to me that younger leaders have more responsibility in this area because we had the privilege of attending seminary during the &#039;good days,&#039; when our older counter-parts were not provided the tools that we have come to expect.  They were fed liberal challenges to the text; we were fed Sola Scriptura.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points Bill!  I have two fears along these lines.  First, that we simply assume a knowledge of the 1st Century text and jump quickly to the application of this assumed understanding.  I think we must ask the question, &#8216;How can we ensure that those leading within our ministries actually know the text?&#8217;  </p>
<p>Most seminary programs require entry level courses into important areas only to focus more heavily upon areas of ministry specialty and practical concern.  Seminaries are under pressure as they work to attract prospective students to reduce the intimidating requirements of extensive language study, back-grounds, etc.  At the end of the day, everything done w/i ministry is necessarily linked to the text of Scripture.  We need to encourage the hard, tedious, and never-ending work of Biblical studies.</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m afraid that most assume that context means simply the 2 verses before and after the verse being considered.  Obviously, this concern would be mute if we addressed that which is outlined above.</p>
<p>It goes w/o saying, however, that these fears are equally concerning whether we are discussing older leaders or younger leaders.  In all reality, it seems to me that younger leaders have more responsibility in this area because we had the privilege of attending seminary during the &#8216;good days,&#8217; when our older counter-parts were not provided the tools that we have come to expect.  They were fed liberal challenges to the text; we were fed Sola Scriptura.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh C</title>
		<link>http://www.one21.us/blog/rightly-dividing-the-word/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.one21.us/blog/rightly-dividing-the-word/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Bill, 
I really enjoyed your session at the forum this weekend.  I am interested in reading through your fuller work on this discussion of &quot;leadership&quot; in Paul, especially the background materials that enlighten it.  Let me know if that is a possibility.
Thanks,
Josh Collins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
I really enjoyed your session at the forum this weekend.  I am interested in reading through your fuller work on this discussion of &#8220;leadership&#8221; in Paul, especially the background materials that enlighten it.  Let me know if that is a possibility.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Josh Collins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
