One21 LateNight 2011
ONE21 Late Night 2011 is almost here! You won’t want to miss this year’s gathering. We’ll be meeting in the Crystal Ballroom at 9pm on Monday night, October 31st!
We’ll enjoy having Aaron Coe, Vice President of NAMB, with us as well as a panel discussion featuring Missouri pastors and leaders: Darren Casper, John Mark Clifton, Bob Werner, Steve Tanner & Kevin Farr. They will be discussing missional ministry in the context of Missouri. They will bring a wealth of knowledge from both urban & rural Missouri.
Make plans to be there. We’ll have lots of free food and free resources (isn’t that enough reason to show up?) and incredible discussion about leading missional churches in Missouri!
Should Our Gospel Communication Be Reductionist in Its Theology?
Rob Bell created a firestorm of controversy last week with a promotional video about his new book, Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived. Rob Bell is a pastor, bestselling author and creator of the popular “Nooma” video series. The promotional video and the blurb from the publisher, Harper Collins, have led several evangelicals to accuse Bell of being a universalist, that is all people will eventually end up in heaven. Justin Taylor is an editorial VP at Crossway Books and a popular blogger. Taylor wrote his thoughts on Bell’s promotional material and John Piper dismissively wrote “Farewell Rob Bell” on his twitter account.
Author and theologian Maggi Dawn wrote a blog post about the Rob Bell/Universalism controversy. She takes aim at Taylor, Piper and everyone else who is accusing Bell of being a universalist because they have not read Bell’s book yet (it will be released in a few weeks). Dawn defends Rob Bell, not on his supposed universalist views, but on his ability to communicate and what he is trying to do. Bell is seeking to connect with disaffected Christians and “seekers” so he is purposefully simple and is not much of a theologian in his communications, whether written or spoken.
She writes:
“As far as I can see, it’s this, rather than theology per se, (communicating) that is Bell’s real gift. His writing and broadcasting actually covers very little ground theologically, and does so imprecisely, but what he does par excellence is capture the imaginations of those who have become disenchanted with Christianity, and haven’t enough patience or emotional energy to re-examine it … he is reductionist in his theology, but that seems to me to emerge from his deeper longing to communicate at the level of an evangelist and pastor. Once people are interested in theology the finer details can be worked on with theologians who – precisely because of their concern for the finer details – fail to communicate in quite the way Bell does. But if people never get interested in the first place, they will never hang around long enough to examine the finer details” (emphasis mine).
A question is raised concerning her understanding that pastors and evangelists do not need (nor should they) be concerned about theology. As one studies the gospel preaching of some of the early “evangelists” in the book of Acts, they seem rather concerned with theology. Peter seems very theological in his preaching. He doesn’t sugar coat his message (or isn’t reductionist) as he tells his listeners, “You crucified him” and that salvation is found in no other name (Acts 3.13-26; 4.8-12). Peter also mentions that Jesus is a “judge”. Paul, even in a Greek context is not reductionist when he tells his Gentile listeners that a day of judgment will come and that all people should turn from their “ignorance” (Acts 17.22-31).
The point is that if ever there was a need for “seeker sensitive” messages, it was in the early church when Peter and Paul were speaking before either antagonistic audiences or audiences who did not know the entire back story. Yet, these “evangelists” were not reductionist in their theology and Paul on several occasions urged his pastoral representatives guard their doctrine closely (e.g. 1Tim. 4.15-6). Paul even connects pastoral love to strong theology (1 Tim. 1.3-11). Those wishing to communicate with “seekers” need to be thoughtful and understandable, but at the same time, they should not avoid deep theological truths. If preachers are reductionist in evangelism, they could be accused of using a “bait and switch” technique when they start to discuss issues like election, atonement and the concept of Hell or an eternity apart from God. No pastor or evangelist who seeks to communicate the truth of the gospel should ever be accused of being reductionist.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Post authored by Dr. Bill Victor, Ph.D.
Bill Victor was born and raised in St. Louis, MO. He attended Saint Louis University and earned his BA in Communication. He also received a Master of Divinity and PhD (New Testament) from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Bill and his wife, Chris, were married in 1993. They have one daughter, Maggie.
Bill has served local churches in Texas as a youth minister (three years) and as associate pastor of spiritual development (six years). Bill has also taught as an adjunct professor at Southwest Baptist University and College of the Ozarks.
Bill has a passion for creative teaching and working with college students. He has a love for diverse kinds of music, reading and enjoys working out
One21 LateNight
Ok, ok, we know that we have been terribly negligent keeping info up on the website. In fact, it’s almost criminal when you think about how long we’ve gone between posts. We’re sorry. We could give you some justification about being busy with ministry and whatnot, but the truth is that would be an excuse. Please accept our apologies!
To make it up to you we want to invite you to a great evening at the Annual Meeting of the Missouri Baptist Convention. We are hosting an event called “One21 LateNight”. It’s going to happen immediately after that final session of the Annual Meeting on Monday night. We’re going to host a panel discussion featuring 5-6 Missouri pastors who are leading churches across the state who are doing dynamic things for the Kingdom. Dealing specifically with the topic, “What is Missional Ministry in Missouri?”, these pastors will share their stories and field questions concerning specific characteristics of their ministry.
So, who will be on the panel? We know that’s the obvious question you’re wondering. So far these men have agreed to speak.
Kenny Qualls
First Baptist Church – Arnold, MO
Josh Hedger
Freshwater Church – Bolivar, MO
Dr. Rodney Hammer
Blue River / Kansas City Baptist Association – Kansas City, MO
Dr. Neil Franks
First Baptist Church – Branson, MO
Derek Grigg
First Baptist Church – Nixa, MO
We’ll be meeting in the Nebraska Room of the Springfield Expo Center, in the same building as the Convention itself. We’ll be meeting at 9:30 in the evening. Oh, and we’ll also have some snacks and drinks for you just because we like you! *grin*
Can’t wait to see you there!
Rightly Dividing the Word?
We, as Southern Baptists, claim to be people of the book. Yet, I don’t feel that we always put the necessary work in when it comes to teaching and preaching from that book. I recently read two messages on the same passage from SBC pastors and neither one of them referred to the context in which the passage was written. There was no grammatical-historical work done on the text at all. I feel that is all too common in our denomination. When we fail to take into account the context and purpose for which a text was written, then we can make the text mean whatever we want it to mean.
I really think it is important for all believers to study biblical backgrounds to some extent. You will find that when you have at least a cursory understanding of the contexts in which Scripture was written, you will have a fuller picture and a deeper understanding of its meaning. One example of a text that is often preached free from its context is Hebrews 10:25 – “Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another – and all the more as you see the Day approaching.”
Many of us have heard messages (or even taught them ourselves) from this passage about how important it is for us to be a part of a local church and for us to attend church on a regular basis. Now, I am not saying that is not a valid view, but does it do service to the intent of that verse? When we investigate the reason why this verse was written, we see a deeper (and more serious) understanding of this verse.
The book of Hebrews was written to encourage Jewish Christians to stay firm in their faith. They were being persecuted by other Jews because of their devotion to Jesus. They were tempted to return to full fledged Judaism. This isn’t just a message to lapsed Christians who preferred to sleep in on Sundays or to the person who says “I don’t need to go to church to be a good Christian.” To continue meeting together may have been costly for some of the recipients of this letter, but the writer of Hebrews was trying to tell them why it was so necessary for them to keep gathering, even in the face of this pressure.
One New Testament survey (Encountering the New Testament by Elwell and Yarborough) puts it this way:
“After initial courageous reception of the gospel in the face of bitter persecution (10:32-34), they must not throw away the high level of confidence they had attained (10:35). To stand firm is salvation; to shrink back would mean defeat and destruction (10:39).” The writer of Hebrews’ “central purpose is fairly elementary: Trust in the Lord and stand your ground” (349).
Our failure to seriously engage the Scriptures on a deep level was one of the biggest reasons for the 121 Forum. My hope is that we can show a generation of younger leaders (and older ones as well) that we Baptists in Missouri can be vigorous handlers of the Scriptures and that we can bring first century meaning to bear here in the twenty-first century.
Movements & Margins
We who call ourselves Evangelical Christians owe a great debt to Martin Luther. Luther, a Catholic monk who learned that the just shall live by faith rather than by religious behavior, led a Reformation. His impact demonstrates how movements often happen. Rarely if ever do spiritually renewing movements come from the center of a tradition; rather, most of the time movements start at the margins and bring life to the center. In Luther’s case a radical break had to occur because of the flawed soteriology (among other issues) of Catholicism. Luther began the communion that bears his name and the Lutheran church was born.
Before long, after a century or so, the Lutheran church became mired in institutionalism. Along came a young Lutheran priest named Philip Spener, who saw priests enjoying the benefits of being clergy without the concomitant passion for the gospel. He wrote a book called Pia Desideria in 1675 calling for a renewal, a Great Commission Resurgence if you will, in the Lutheran church.
Spener did not have a lot of demographic data to show him the need for a renewal in his time. His pastoral wisdom and insights from others observing the same thing was enough. Those in the center of Lutheranism did not jump on the idea of resurgence he called for in his book. In summary he called for these points of renewal:
1. A greater commitment to spread the Word of God (we might call this becoming more gospel-centered).
2. A renewed emphasis on the priesthood of all believers.
3. A greater focus given to the development of individual spiritual life.
4. Establishing truth not through disputes but through repentance and a holy life.
5. Candidates for the ministry should be genuine Christians, who have had spiritual training.
6. Sermons should not demonstrate the preacher’s erudition, but attempt to teach and edify.
Facebook
Flickr
